Reviews You Can Trust
SonicWall TZ370 and Cisco Meraki MX68 can both make sense for businesses, but they fit different operating models. This comparison weighs threat prevention, firewall policy, SD-WAN, VPN, reporting, centralized management, licensing, support ownership, hardware fit, and branch security risk, support expectations, cost shape, and which buyer should choose each option.
Head-to-head
A practical A/B look at SonicWall TZ370 and Cisco Meraki MX68, focused on threat prevention, firewall policy, SD-WAN, VPN, reporting, centralized management, licensing, support ownership, hardware fit, and branch security risk, cost, support, deployment fit, and long-term ownership.
SonicWall TZ370 is stronger when the business wants a compact SonicWall TZ firewall with SonicOS, gateway security services, Capture ATP options, secure SD-WAN, VPN, centralized management, and SMB branch protection.
Cisco Meraki MX68 is stronger when the business wants Meraki Dashboard management, AutoVPN, SD-WAN, stateful firewalling, threat controls, content filtering, dual WAN planning, and simple multi-site security operations.
Deep dive
The SonicWall TZ370 versus Meraki MX68 decision depends on management fit, deployment reality, feature depth, cost shape, support ownership, upgrade timing, and how the system will be maintained after launch across every business location. That keeps final rollout planning practical.
Best fit: SonicWall TZ370 works best for buyers prioritizing SonicOS-managed SMB threat prevention. Cisco Meraki MX68 works best for buyers prioritizing cloud-managed security and AutoVPN branches. Start with the operating model, team constraints, and support owner before comparing one headline feature. Today.
Management model: Business systems differ most in how they are managed after rollout. SonicWall TZ370 favors one administration path, while Meraki MX68 favors another. Buyers should choose the system their staff or provider can keep healthy every month. That keeps planning practical.
Feature planning: Feature lists only matter when users, permissions, integrations, devices, and training support them. A stronger platform can disappoint if workflow design, setup ownership, or policy decisions create bottlenecks before teams benefit. That keeps final rollout decisions grounded in practice today.
Deployment reality: Implementation details often decide the better fit. Number porting, device support, user permissions, call flows, reporting access, security policies, integrations, training, and troubleshooting handoffs should be mapped before the system is purchased. That keeps final rollout decisions grounded in practice.
Cost and support: The lower starting price is not always the lower ownership cost. Businesses should compare licenses, support response, add-ons, implementation help, training, renewal terms, and the internal owner responsible for keeping the system stable. That keeps final rollout planning practical today.
Final choice: SonicWall TZ370 earns the edge because it better matches the default network security appliances buyer described here. Cisco Meraki MX68 remains a strong alternative when its strengths line up with the exact workflow and management expectations. That keeps planning practical.
Methodology
This comparison uses current category research and buyer-decision analysis rather than hands-on lab testing.
Scope: This comparison uses official product information, vendor documentation, and buyer workflow analysis. We did not claim hands-on lab testing of SonicWall TZ370 and Cisco Meraki MX68; the goal is to map practical fit, adoption risk, and purchase criteria. Today.
What we compared: We compared threat prevention, firewall policy, SD-WAN, VPN, reporting, centralized management, licensing, support, hardware fit, and buyer fit, operating control, implementation effort, scalability, cost shape, reporting needs, integration burden, data governance, support expectations, and how quickly a business can get reliable outcomes after setup.
How results are interpreted: The winner is the stronger default for the buyer described here, not a universal answer. SonicWall TZ370 and Cisco Meraki MX68 can both be correct when company size, workflow maturity, budget, staffing, and change-management tolerance point different directions.
What buyers should verify: Before deciding, verify current pricing, feature availability, contract terms, migration support, security requirements, data ownership, integration limits, reporting depth, exit options, and the internal owner who will keep the workflow working. That keeps rollout planning practical.
FAQ
Verdict
This matchup favors SonicWall TZ370 when the buyer needs SonicOS-managed SMB threat prevention.
#1 Winner
SonicWall TZ370SonicWall TZ370 is the better default when its strengths match the operating plan, support owner, and upgrade timing.
Tip: Name the system owner before buying. The best choice is the one your team can configure, monitor, update, and support consistently.
Jump to the sections that clarify operating model, cost shape, implementation risk, and the final business-fit recommendation.
Use demos, trials, discovery calls, and contract review before committing budget.
Tip: Document responsibilities before kickoff so the winning option has an owner, timeline, data plan, and review point.